How has this experience changed the way we understand church?
I think it’s important to differentiate, when we’re talking about ‘church’ as a theological category, between the ontological, meaning the nature or essence of what church is, and the more functional or pragmatic definitions. Obviously, we want our functional ideas and practices and definitions to be informed by the ontological meaning how God defines the church. The Church is supposed to carry out certain works [Funt], for cetain purposes [Tel], because of the way God has made it [Ont]. Of course a common way to understand this is through the Nicene Creed which uses characteristics one, holy, catholic, apostolic to describe the nature of the church. So in terms of what the church is or how God defines the church, or even what it is tasked with doing such as being the steward of the missio Dei really not much has changed. It’s essence has not changed.
Or at least it shouldn’t because while theological development is conversational between Revelation and context, how you under the nature of the church hasn’t changed. All of us we have an opportunity during this pandemic to revisit our prior assumptions about what church is because we typically define things by what they do and accomplish rather than what they are. This is an unfortunate consequence of modern industrialization.
So with that said, we’d looking at more functional or pragmatic understandings of what the church is and in that case of our course our understanding of the church has changed greatly. A common way that we can think about the functional nature of the church are by the marks of a good church, meaning the word rightly preached the gospel being preached, and the sacraments rightly administered, and even if you add a third which is commonly thrown in which is church discipline. Well all three of those have been comprised in some way during this pandemic.
As a Lead Pastor of a church my preaching continues but it is to video camera. And this has tragic theological ramification because it is not a sufficient replacement for this mark. Preaching the word rightly implies an in person experience. In fact, one could argue that settling for a virtual preaching experience as a sufficient replacement for the gathered saints would be akin to denying the necessity of the incarnation where the Son God came in embodied presence to us. And so while this has changed for a season, we can’t settle for this as a sufficient mark replacement.
The same things goes for the sacraments or ordinances. And we can just look at one. What does communion look like? Even before there were stay at home order many churches, mine included, chose to suspend communion because the way we conduct it is through intinction where you dip the bread in the wine or juice and so the communal threat during a pandemic are to great to continue in that manner. Not to mention, what does communion look like over virtual church? Our church has chosen to suspend communion during this season because we believe that the ordinance of communion is a gathered church practice not just an individual experience that should be practiced at home.
What does church look like in the future and what we envision the church looking like in the future?
I think that for many churches, we’re taking this opportunity to implement online church and we plan to continue offering it even after we’re able to gather together not only because some people will not be safe to come back but also because we’re reaching people with gospel that would never step foot in a church gathering in person. So it serves as a kind of preview to what church is like.
I also think that the church is going to have to take seriously the mental health challenges that are being exacerbated by this crisis and so church will have to be able to help people in a more holistic manner to be whole again. The amount interpersonal tragedy that is unfolding right now not just the pandemic but physical abuse, substance abuse, the church is going to have it’s work cut out for itself for a generation. That’s going to require more resources directed at mental health.
(This is an excerpt from a panel interview at Denver Seminary. You can find the entire panel here.)